Not my Children
by Kat Wiebe
Sunday
morning. Sun’s up. Me too. I’ve always been an early riser, leaving warm bed
and bodies behind as I investigate what has begun. Setting moon or rising sun,
ocean, meadow, mountain, town—all are newly birthed and unexplored at this time
of day.
Even
as a girl I would rise and leave the quiet house before the others, only to return
to bed and warm blankets before having to get ready for school. It’s a habit
that was only interrupted when I became a mother.
Sure,
in the early days, I could zip him—or even them—into fleece and down. Tucked
inside my parka, or snuggled into sheepskin, they greeted the day with me. The
folks at the Bagel Café, which opened at 6:30 am, knew us. Primo and I wondered
why the newspaper deliveryman wore a bicycle helmet before there were any other
vehicles on the morning streets—the owls were attacking his head, he explained.
But
at a certain point life became too fraught with logistics—what with school and
work and homework and a nutritional breakfast and lunches to be made—and
that early-morning exploration ritual became hit and miss, very much missed.
So
today, this gorgeous Sunday in mid June offers early dawn and alpenglow, and I
am free to venture out. Just walking to the swimming pool is a sensual feast. Cottonwoods and silverberry exude wild
perfume as the rising sun dispels the early morning chill and highlights the billion-year-old
rock dramatically up thrust at my periphery. Closer at hand a hummingbird finds
food fast at an oleaster thicket, and plain old mallards dabble for breakfast
in the muck at the bottom of the stream.
Why
am I free to wander this morning, inspired by daybreak and Mary Oliver and
rocket fueled by two shots of espresso?
Where
are my children, those boys whose birth so transformed my life and made a
mother out of me? An attentive, stay-by-their sides, sleep-in-the-den with
them, carry-them-everywhere, rarely-be-apart-from-them type of mother?
They
are at their other house, the house where they spend fifty percent of their lives,
the lives they live with their bio dad and his wife, their other life—the one
that doesn’t include me.
Oh,
but don’t worry. They’re safe and loved there too. We four adults are mature
and appropriate co-parents. We communicate and work together in the best
interests of our shared children. We’ve been living this way since the youngest
was one, and he’s seven now.
So
we’re all used to it.
Right
now I know they are warm in their bunks, Primo on top and Secundo on the
bottom. I’ve been in their room. It’s sunny and hung with red curtains. Their
bookshelf is stuffed full of Sandra Boynton and Curious George and other kid
classics. There’s a kite hanging from the ceiling and a growth chart and bins
of Lego and more than a few stray socks on the carpet.
When
they wake up, they’ll put on their bathrobes, tie the sashes around their
waists and trundle downstairs for homemade waffles—while I have all the time in
the world to do as I please. No clamouring voices, no requests for help with
the knife, no pleas for extra syrup, no sticky fingers on my skin, no spilled
milk, no recounting of dreams, telling of bad jokes, or wiping of dirty faces.
I
have all the headspace I could possible need. I awoke when I wanted, lay with
my warm husband, and nose up, I headed out into an uncharted day. I know many
mothers only dream of the free moments I get. They tell me this often. Family
life is so busy, parenting—especially in the early years—so demanding that
relationships, both with self and partner, suffer.
Just
last night Andy and I made love in the living room, in front of a fire, and
then we ate cake and I may have even had a scoop of ice cream. Or was it a
square of dark chocolate? Did we really pass a sip of tequila from tongue to
tongue?
My
husband is Handy Andy. He can fix anything. “Look, if you had one shot, one
opportunity,” he quotes Eminem, “to seize everything you ever wanted in one
moment, would you capture it or just let it slip?”
This
morning I am capturing it, seizing the day with both hands, open hearted and
vulnerable, present and available. I am right here.
Right
here, in the pool, in water as blue as the Mar Carribe—in which I used
to swim way back when I was not yet a mother and still roamed the world at
will, one morning at a time, accumulating adventures, evolving, becoming the
person that I became in order to become the woman that I am.
Sun pierces liquid and the moving medium strobes with
prisms as I hang suspended, holding my breath, sobbing underwater.
*
* *
It took Andy by surprise, the first time I wept after making love—and the next
and the next. “Uh,” he’d wonder. “Is everything all right? I mean––” Being a
man, he was naturally concerned about his performance.
He didn’t understand why I’d release like
that, my ecstasy turned so suddenly, and thoroughly, to agony. Just part of my
process, I told him. Grieving the loss of my boys—grieving the half-life my
motherhood has become. He argued that the boys were fine, but my limbic brain
tuned into the boys’ absence despite my neo-cortex’s insistence that all was
well, that they were safe, and I so happy in love.
My
grief when the boys aren’t with me is always there. Deep, in the middle of my
brain, in the place where I am a mammal, where it is imperative to touch my
pups, to nuzzle and cuddle them, to herd them and teach them and always,
always, have my eye on them, there is such a disconnect when they are not here.
One weekend, very early on, I let myself go: I lay on the floor and
sobbed while Andy hovered in the doorway watching me.
“I’m supposed to leave you alone, right?”
“Yup, just let me fucking cry. I am sad.”
He tried to understand: “You say it’s so great with us—so what’s wrong,
are we not good?” (More checking.)
“I love you, but I miss the boys.” (He
showed visible relief.)
“So this is just about that?” (Just?! I thought to myself.)
“It won’t take away the pain,” said my GP when I asked him about Prozac, “but
it’ll take it down a notch.” He offered a prescription, if I needed it. I left
his office without pharmaceuticals and gauged the pain and noticed it was
always there when the boys were not.
Looking
back, I am not surprised that Andy was confused. The process of separating when
you have kids is complex. The divorce may or may not seem like a good thing,
but separating from the children is likely universally tough. Parents—and
kids—experience grief, a roller-coaster ride that takes us on an inter-twined,
circular, figure-eight pathway that is dynamic, not linear. We all go from
protest and denial to despair, detachment and—hopefully—meaning. Ideally, we eventually loop into hope,
exploration and new investment. Interestingly, Andy reports that the
separations from the boys get harder for him as he bonds with them more deeply
over time.
Unmistakably,
there is loss. Not only are the children not with me, they are with the person
that I have decided I cannot live with.
You’ve
got to see the difficulty in that—and the irony. The two adults who cannot live
together must let go of their child/ren into the care of each other—to live
with, to bond with, to love and adore and depend upon, and to need and miss and
to look forward to being with.
This
is not easy.
I went to see a spiritual teacher.
“What can I do for you?” the Latin woman in a white turban and robe asked
me when I sat down in front of her. I started crying immediately.
“It’s my two kids,” I blubbered. “I have this 30-70 split with their dad
that’s becoming 60-40, and moving to 50-50 in the next few years.”
“And?” She raised an eyebrow beneath that imposing turban.
“I’ve accepted that it’s good to be uncoupled. Their dad and I are
creating an awesome new way of relating after being unhappy for some years.
I’ve got a new man in my life who loves me and loves the boys. It’s all good.
But I can’t stand being away from my children.” I cried, not even bothering to
wipe away my tears. “It’s just not right to be separated from them, not even
for a day!”
“Oh,” she raised a hand to her
forehead and pretended to swoon. “All this drama. Weeping and carrying on. When
there is nothing to cry about.”
“They’re my
children,” I insisted, betting she didn’t have any. “It’s not right for them to
be away from me. They’re mine!”
“Yours,” she
laughed. Then she became stern. “They are not yours.”
That stopped me in
my tracks. Not mine? I was nauseated for nine months twice. I pushed what felt
like two bowling balls through my pelvis and out my vagina. I survived sleep-deprivation,
post partum depression, and left the work force. Not to mention that I gave up
the life I lived for forty years to figure out how to guide two new humans through
a world that had changed dramatically since I was a kid. My experience of mothering is right up
there with every peak experience I have ever had, including meeting and mating.
It has been powerfully joyful, satisfying, pleasurable, and transcendent. I
certainly didn’t intend to relinquish
being the best damn caregiver they could ever have. Which meant, in my opinion,
being with them.
I looked at her,
much more pissed off than I expected to feel during a spiritual counseling
session.
“Not yours,” she
repeated.
I knew what she meant
in the theoretical sense of “They come through you but not from you/ And though
they are with you yet they belong not to you.” But Kahlil Gibran didn’t have kids either. It’s inspirational on
one level. In reality my stomach dropped at the thought of my kids away from me
half of the time.
“You are caught up
in this drama,” she said, more gently now. “Wasting your time with all this
crying. Getting in the way of yourself and what you are meant to be doing with
your life. You have an opportunity here. Everything is aligned for you. Take
it. Don’t mess it up.”
“Oh.”
“Get on with this fifty-fifty arrangement. Grow up!”
When
I asked my boys—now eight and eleven—how separating families should arrange the
mother-father care split, I received interesting answers. Secundo said it
should be fifty-fifty. “That’s fair,” he said. Primo looked inwards: “A kid
needs his mom more,” he counseled. “Because she knows how to take better care
of a young child.”
Is
that his experience? Or is that a universal?
I came of age reading Germaine Greer and Gloria
Steinem. As a teenager I was rabidly against having children because I thought
it imperative to kick the old Kinder, Küche,
Kirche habit. Yet, when I became a mother, I wanted nothing but to mother
my children, and I flouted feminism by giving up my work and devoting myself to
them. I know there is chemistry involved, and biology. There’s plenty of
research to support mammalian attachment. But I didn’t know any of it at the
time. I just know what I felt.
“Does my child need me?” A woman I know is trying to do what is right for
her two-year-old. “Or is it that I need her?” She and her ex are currently
navigating the waters of parenting after separation.
“Is she fine with her dad fifty-fifty right off the bat? Or is it better
for her to be with mom more?”
Good
questions. The answers require the heart of Buddha, the wisdom of Solomon and
the genius of Einstein.
In the legal system there is no presumption in favour of equal parenting. It is
something that couples must negotiate. It is the one piece I was stuck on, and
the sole point for which we sought legal guidance: I did not want fifty-fifty
to start. The boys were one and
four when we separated. Secundo, still a baby, was breastfeeding. Primo was accustomed
to my care. We settled on a seventy-thirty arrangement, working toward
fifty-fifty by the time Secundo was school age.
Ironically here’s where feminism’s effect is evident: the trend toward
participatory fathers is increasing. No longer does a father’s role end at
sperm donation. I applaud this change, and at the same time, admit that
relinquishing the care of my children to their father—full bore—is the hardest
thing I’ve ever done. And while I am proud of myself, and believe it’s best for
my boys, my dirty little secret is that I’m envious of (and a little angry
with) those moms who, for whatever reason, end up with the bigger share of the
care and custody of their children.
Last year my boys went with their dad
and his wife to attend the memorial of their stepmom’s mother. There they were
with the clan that I am not part of: cousins I have not met, uncle, aunt,
friends of family—all strangers to me. Their dad’s parents, who used to be my
in-laws, were there too, and together they participated in the ritual of
mourning and celebration. A milestone in my boys’ lives—for death must be
accepted and understood as part of life.
Every family has their ways, their own
subtle beliefs and practices. I will not be privy to that deep, often unspoken,
modeling. What happens when we die, after we die? Why are we born? How is death
celebrated, a life commemorated? This is for my boys alone to discover with
that wing of their family.
Are they in good hands? I know they are safe, their primary needs well handled.
They will have delicious family dinners and special breakfasts that I will not
taste. They are probably neater, tidier, more contained than when they are with
me. They will play with their cousins, two girls similar in age, whom I have
never met. They may hear prayers and reference to a religious belief that is
not mine.
While they were away my "wasband" emailed me a photo of
them in button down shirts with fresh haircuts. Bright eyes, ears sticking out
like jug-handles and closed-mouth smiles.
I was grateful for the picture, for news of
the changes in their lives, for a glimpse into the window of that world. And of
course I missed them. Of course I wanted to smell their hair, and touch their
cheeks, and hear their white noise—Primo’s repetitive whistling and snippets of
things he says to himself, Secundo’s constant questions, and even the sniping
and bickering that happens, inevitably, no matter the day or occasion.
The photo evoked in me a longing. It
unsettled me. And momentarily I was undone. When they are away, the ache I feel
is still intense, their absence
palpable.
And I am able to
live with this.
I am not the centre
of their universe; they are unmistakably whole and my wholeness is separate
from theirs, and them, though we have every intersection. We are both attached
and discrete, completely sustained within and without each other. I write this
for every mother—and father—who shares this loss. For us to progress, evolve,
and eventually resolve, we must accept this arrangement.
“They come through
us but they are not us”—I can’t say it better than Gibran—yet their passage
changes us. For those who are affected, it is difficult to discriminate the
magic from the magician, the transformation from the agent, the reaction from
the catalyst. Our Herculean task is to allow the meaning to abide, and the
peace of mind to exist—even when they’re not with us.
When they’re not
with me I want them to be happy and whole, to have joy and peace, to feel loved
and connected. I don’t want these qualities to be present only when I am
present. I suppose, I wish the same for myself.
When
they come back, I look for it. I always do. In that first moment of
reconnection, I often see it: something has changed. What did I miss? A new
word or concept, an epiphany or fresh development? A turn of phrase, an
emerging facet of their psyche, a growth spurt? Did they not get what they
need? Or did they? Did he do something better than I can? Did they like his cooking
better than mine? I do. Or his Christmas presents? Or possibly, probably, the
tidiness of his house?
But
in a flash it is absorbed. They are seen and all is known. We pick up right
where we left off. The pause button turns to play. This is how I manifest my
love for these boys, and how I transform the grief that I feel each and every
time they leave.
I
miss you so much, Secundo said when he left, curling his fingers around the
kiss I placed in his palm. I love you as big as a thousand skies, whispered
Primo when we said good-bye. I love you when I’m with you and I love you when
I’m not, I promised. And when they returned we slept together, Primo snuggled
between my legs, his head on my thigh, Secundo beside me, his feet poking me in
the middle of the night. We learned to live with the new rhythm. All of us adjusting and
readjusting—mother, father, and the new partners who joined us and took on
parenting roles. First they were with me. Then they went to their other house
and I was alone with Andy. Then the boys came barreling back into the calm
house where Andy’s fourteen-year-old black Lab lay quietly on the sofa all day.
Then they rocketed back over to their dad’s where they made Christmas cookies.
Primo practiced his letters at that house too. Secundo toddled around their
family room too. We began to make our way together—in this way.
I
saw the boys unexpectedly yesterday. Day four into our week without them and
Andy and I were headed to the hills for an overnight backcountry campout to
celebrate our fifth anniversary under a full moon. Waiting at a stoplight I
glanced to my right, and there they were: two very familiar faces brightening
into radiant smiles as we noticed each other. “Hey!” and “I love you!” and “I
was just at a birthday party!” and “Say hi to Snowy!” rebounded between the
vehicles and then Andy and I turned left and the boys went straight.
The
surprise of seeing them sent pure joy cart-wheeling through my veins. Andy felt
it too.
The
boys may not be under my roof all the time, but they are under the loving lid
of the universe. And that’s how we live together, all the time.
3 comments:
I love this Kat. Best reading I have done in years. In a few minutes I experienced all emotions. Thank you for the lovely read. Laura
BOOM! You hit me hard - thank you Kat Wiebe.
Beautiful!
Post a Comment